<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OPP: Objectivist Pre-Postmodernism, or Masculine Erections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quangtruong.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quangtruong.net/?p=127</link>
	<description>media, architecture, &#38; design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:24:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: test</title>
		<link>http://www.quangtruong.net/?p=127&#038;cpage=1#comment-63465</link>
		<dc:creator>test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nibit.net/?p=127#comment-63465</guid>
		<description>There are definitely numerous particulars like that to take into consideration. That may be a nice point to bring up. I offer the thoughts above as normal inspiration but clearly there are questions just like the one you carry up where an important thing will be working in trustworthy good faith. I don?t know if best practices have emerged round issues like that, however I am sure that your job is clearly recognized as a good game. Each boys and girls feel the affect of just a second’s pleasure, for the remainder of their lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are definitely numerous particulars like that to take into consideration. That may be a nice point to bring up. I offer the thoughts above as normal inspiration but clearly there are questions just like the one you carry up where an important thing will be working in trustworthy good faith. I don?t know if best practices have emerged round issues like that, however I am sure that your job is clearly recognized as a good game. Each boys and girls feel the affect of just a second’s pleasure, for the remainder of their lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quang Truong</title>
		<link>http://www.quangtruong.net/?p=127&#038;cpage=1#comment-4076</link>
		<dc:creator>Quang Truong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nibit.net/?p=127#comment-4076</guid>
		<description>I have read the novel. I appreciate your dissenting opinion. I really wish you would point out specifically where and how you disagree. I think there are a lot of people who think Rand is a genius, but there are also a lot of people (probably more?) who think she is a mediocre mind (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/02/books/02rand.html?_r=1). As for the question, &quot;who the fuck am i?&quot; I think this blog is an attempt to address that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read the novel. I appreciate your dissenting opinion. I really wish you would point out specifically where and how you disagree. I think there are a lot of people who think Rand is a genius, but there are also a lot of people (probably more?) who think she is a mediocre mind (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/02/books/02rand.html?_r=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/02/books/02rand.html?_r=1</a>). As for the question, &#8220;who the fuck am i?&#8221; I think this blog is an attempt to address that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.quangtruong.net/?p=127&#038;cpage=1#comment-4075</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nibit.net/?p=127#comment-4075</guid>
		<description>This is quite sad. I suggest you read the novel  before blurting out a neat list of adjectives. It really isn&#039;t worth addressing your criticisms when they&#039;re such generalities-- it&#039;s obvious you don&#039;t know a thing about Rand, nor anything about the novel. AND to even SUGGEST Rand would intentionally or unintentionally marginalize herself or femininity in her work is really laughable. You&#039;ve muddled the intentions of her characters as well as her ground concepts-- especially when you use the word &#039;dictatorial&#039;. It really just gets more and more ridiculous. If you read anything by Rand, The Fountainhead included, she explicitly demonstrates her disdain for any fascist, dictatorial or communistic system.

You also succeeded in misquoting Wright by taking his words out of context. Nice! You&#039;re clearly the big person here, &#039;Quang Truong&#039;? Who the fuck are you anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite sad. I suggest you read the novel  before blurting out a neat list of adjectives. It really isn&#8217;t worth addressing your criticisms when they&#8217;re such generalities&#8211; it&#8217;s obvious you don&#8217;t know a thing about Rand, nor anything about the novel. AND to even SUGGEST Rand would intentionally or unintentionally marginalize herself or femininity in her work is really laughable. You&#8217;ve muddled the intentions of her characters as well as her ground concepts&#8211; especially when you use the word &#8216;dictatorial&#8217;. It really just gets more and more ridiculous. If you read anything by Rand, The Fountainhead included, she explicitly demonstrates her disdain for any fascist, dictatorial or communistic system.</p>
<p>You also succeeded in misquoting Wright by taking his words out of context. Nice! You&#8217;re clearly the big person here, &#8216;Quang Truong&#8217;? Who the fuck are you anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
